Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Expanding Democracy at LSB Meetings -- a Motion to the ...



This is called anarchy
 
 
In a message dated 5/20/2008 1:41:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
fflefever@xxxxxxxxx writes:

 
 
 
Terry, this could be usefully re-posted at:
_http://www.listenerhttp://www.http://www.listhttp://wwwhttp://wwhttp://www_ 
(http://www.listenerforums.net/cgi-bin/issues_config.pl?noframes;read=85748) 

Also  at: _http://groups.http://grohttp://groups.<Whttp_ 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/friendsofwbai/) 

Will  you do it, or may I?

--Frank  Lefever

=====================================
--- In  _NewPacifica@NewPacifica@New_ (mailto:NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) ,  
Terry Goodman <tgoodman@..t> wrote:
>
> On Mon May 19,  2008, Mitchel Cohen wrote:
> 
> >I am proposing the following  change, to be discussed and voted upon 
> >at the upcoming LSB  meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 7 pm.
> >
> >The purpose of  the following proposal to change procedure at Local 
> >Station Board  meetings is to allow members of WBAI, and not only 
> >delegates to  the Board, to participate in an organized, disciplined 
> >way in  discussions of Reports and other matters brought to the LSB.
>  <snip>
> 
> I would caution against calling this procedure  simply a "Quasi
> Committee of the Whole," because the Parliamentary  Authority already
> defines that body and its rules differently, and it  is a already a
> useful method as it stands that would be surrendered  upon such
> substitution. Rather than modify the rules of a Quasi  Committee of
> the Whole, the WBAI LSB could establish a permanent LSB  Advisory
> Committee of the Whole, define its purpose as informal  consideration
> within committee of the single topic under discussion at  the LSB
> meeting for which the committee meeting was called, its  membership as
> being all who are present at the LSB meeting in  question, including
> LSB Members and all other attendees (unless the  LSB cares to restrict
> to Foundation members in the original motion),  it's notice requirement
> as satisfied by notice of the LSB meeting at  which the committee
> meeting occurs,* and its chair as the then  presiding LSB Chair or
> Chair Pro-Tem. By default, this committee would  operate under the
> same rules as any other committee, but if the motion  establishing the
> committee includes the special rules outlined in your  proposal, then
> those rules rather than the default committee rules  thereby suspended
> would then apply to this LSB Advisory Committee of  the Whole. Where
> not specifically suspended, the regular rules of  order for committees
> would still apply. Among the special rules I'd  suggest for this
> committee, it would have no quorum requirement and it  would be
> automatically adjourned when the Chair calls for the LSB  meeting to
> re-convene.
> 
> The "informal consideration"  phrase allows a person to speak more than
> once, or some back-and-forth  consultation to occur. The "advisory"
> and "in committee" terms  underscore that the decisions of the
> committee are not binding on the  LSB. 
> 
> Your proposal to authorize the Chair discretion to  "declare" an LSB
> meeting recess for a fixed-duration meeting of the  Advisory Quasi
> Committee of the Whole could be separately proposed as  an LSB special
> rule of order, but I don't think it really necessary.  Once the
> mechanism of all present automatically being members of an  instantly
> available permanent committee is recognized, the Chair could  entertain
> a motion to use the mechanism at any time and any LSB Member  could
> similarly move to recess for this purpose.
> 
>  Discussions in this committee would naturally inform the discussion of
>  any pending question before the LSB when it re-convenes, and
>  individual LSB members are free to make and second related motions,
>  perhaps to amend the motion on the floor from another committee; but
>  it should be made very clear whether or not the committee will be
>  allowed to vote on motions and whether or not any motions approved in
>  this committee are to obtain immediate consideration rather than await
>  a different time on the agenda. 
> 
> --Terry Goodman
>  
> *For strict compliance with notice requirements, it might be best  if,
> once this committee was established, all future LSB meeting  notices
> include mention that a meeting of the LSB Advisory Committee  of the
> Whole may occur during the meeting. This might not strictly  be
> necessary because the bylaws say that notice at an LSB meeting  is
> deemed adequate notice for LSB  committees.
=============================================


 




**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family 
favorites at AOL Food.      
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)


questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.16