[NewPacifica] Re: Expanding Democracy at LSB Meetings -- a Motion to the LSB



On Mon May 19, 2008, Mitchel Cohen wrote:

>I am proposing the following change, to be discussed and voted upon 
>at the upcoming LSB meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 7 pm.
>
>The purpose of the following proposal to change procedure at Local 
>Station Board meetings is to allow members of WBAI, and not only 
>delegates to the Board, to participate in an organized, disciplined 
>way in discussions of Reports and other matters brought to the LSB.
<snip>

I would caution against calling this procedure simply a "Quasi
Committee of the Whole," because the Parliamentary Authority already
defines that body and its rules differently, and it is a already a
useful method as it stands that would be surrendered upon such
substitution.  Rather than modify the rules of a Quasi Committee of
the Whole, the WBAI LSB could establish a permanent LSB Advisory
Committee of the Whole, define its purpose as informal consideration
within committee of the single topic under discussion at the LSB
meeting for which the committee meeting was called, its membership as
being all who are present at the LSB meeting in question, including
LSB Members and all other attendees (unless the LSB cares to restrict
to Foundation members in the original motion), it's notice requirement
as satisfied by notice of the LSB meeting at which the committee
meeting occurs,* and its chair as the then presiding LSB Chair or
Chair Pro-Tem.  By default, this committee would operate under the
same rules as any other committee, but if the motion establishing the
committee includes the special rules outlined in your proposal, then
those rules rather than the default committee rules thereby suspended
would then apply to this LSB Advisory Committee of the Whole.  Where
not specifically suspended, the regular rules of order for committees
would still apply.  Among the special rules I'd suggest for this
committee, it would have no quorum requirement and it would be
automatically adjourned when the Chair calls for the LSB meeting to
re-convene.

The "informal consideration" phrase allows a person to speak more than
once, or some back-and-forth consultation to occur.  The "advisory"
and "in committee" terms underscore that the decisions of the
committee are not binding on the LSB. 

Your proposal to authorize the Chair discretion to "declare" an LSB
meeting recess for a fixed-duration meeting of the Advisory Quasi
Committee of the Whole could be separately proposed as an LSB special
rule of order, but I don't think it really necessary.  Once the
mechanism of all present automatically being members of an instantly
available permanent committee is recognized, the Chair could entertain
a motion to use the mechanism at any time and any LSB Member could
similarly move to recess for this purpose.

Discussions in this committee would naturally inform the discussion of
any pending question before the LSB when it re-convenes, and
individual LSB members are free to make and second related motions,
perhaps to amend the motion on the floor from another committee; but
it should be made very clear whether or not the committee will be
allowed to vote on motions and whether or not any motions approved in
this committee are to obtain immediate consideration rather than await
a different time on the agenda.   

--Terry Goodman

*For strict compliance with notice requirements, it might be best if,
once this committee was established, all future LSB meeting notices
include mention that a meeting of the LSB Advisory Committee of the
Whole may occur during the meeting.  This might not strictly be
necessary because the bylaws say that notice at an LSB meeting is
deemed adequate notice for LSB committees.    



questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.16