Re: [NewPacifica] No Folios? [ Subject was: Re: Re: you have been dealt with.]



Title: Re: [NewPacifica] No Folios? [ Subject was: Re: Re: you h
Kevin,
I may have not made myself clear:  money is not the only determining factor in creating an audience, and of course you are correct that people on both ends of the financial curve both do and do not use the Internet.  However, one thing I've learned over the past few years is that the word "Internet" means different things to different people.  Word processing, on-line public programs, weather and mainstream news on line, movie house timetables, googling a word or a vacation spot or a medicine - lots of stuff on there, but for many people with access,  it means AOL, and not much more.

I'm talking about the kind of connection that people make to a radio station that does not come from the Internet:  it's different, it's parallel, it's not always co-existent.  I think that many of the people I talk with, and work with, simply do not use the Internet to connect to radio, at least not in any way that would do listener-supported Pacifica stations any good.  The loyalty, the consistent financial support, the caring that would translate into taking part in elections - that comes from the air, I think, and if we do create an Internet base, it will be different - and many former listeners will be left behind.  Here age may be a better predictor of behavior than income.

Nothing wrong with creating a new clientele - but it's like the Pacifica website. Just as some people were getting good enough to find pacifica.org, and navigate its quirks, we created a new website.  What is the rationale for it?  People have to want to get to the new site - are they given a reason?  I don't see one.  Are they forwarded there automatically?  Why not?  Inevitably, some people are going to decide not to bother, especially since there doesn't seem to be a compelling reason offered on the old site for trying out the new one.  (And this from someone who has long voiced complaints about being unable to find things on the original site: I'm hoping the new site will be much more user-friendly, but no one is making me any promises that would encourage me to bookmark the second site right now. )

I agree that income is not always a good predictor of who is Internet savvy and who is not, but leisure to pursue esoteric radio broadcasts is another matter.  Listening to the radio encourages multi-tasking away from the computer - again, a different audience from that glued to the monitor, whose ideas of "multi-tasking" may not include cooking, doing household chores, working on homework, etc.  Although the digital divide is narrowing, I don't think that every radio listener is going to make the transition to the Internet as a source of entertainment, background companion, essential information, or even news.  Can we afford to jettison those listeners?  How can we keep them?  I think print is an essential link to that audience - and hence I would argue for the necessity of folios.
Carolyn




Carolyn,
 
Respectfully, in Houston at least our libraries are literally crammed with the disenfranchised yearning to be free into public computer consoles with unfiltered connection to the Internet. Even the smelliest homeless family has access to word processing, on-line public programs, and even the vilest spam.
 
I've even met a few people who make six figures who never go on the Internet.
 
I hope this isn't rude, because it is not my intention.
 
Kevin White
 
 


Carolyn Birden <cmcb007@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Now that the National Office/Foundation is getting into programming, and also sending out fundraising letters to all members in all stations, perhaps those mailings (fundraising) could include not only previews of national programming plans, but reviews of recent programs (hearings, etc.), letters from the new ED, and contact information for all stations, for letters and communications from the members to their local stations, either to the LSBs or to the GMs as the listeners wish.

If Pacifica is to keep to its mission, it really cannot forget that a great many listeners are NOT on the INternet, do NOT use the Internet daily to keep up with information about their radio stations, and still read and write on paper.  Many of these listeners are also those with some discretionary income, hint hint.  At WBAI the curtailment of the Folio disadvantages exactly those listeners who were its most loyal supporters in the past: no surprise that our donations are way down.  No surprise that some people are not anxious to reinstate monthly folios to the listeners.

Carolyn


A more extensive on-line Folio would be good.
 Not everyone has a computer.
 
In the written folio in the past there was as a space for letters to the editor and to programmers.
 
Having other media venues around the hegemony (different at all five stations ),
for listener members to communicate with programers, staff and station board and commitee members
about what is relavent to having the radio station is important.
 
We realize the limitations of communication by internet on these listservs.
 
Written and published correspondence might be more civil and to the issues.
 
--- Jim Curtis
 
 
Re: Terry Goodman:
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
[Subject was: Re: Re: you have been dealt with.]

On Sat May 13, 2006, Loraine Mirza wrote:

<snip>
>As for no Folios? Seems like our station managers
>haven't gotten on the ball, as they would be the ones
>who would be in charge of fulfilling this very
>important promise that all of us have been waiting for
>since the settlement.

Station production of printed Folios was a fequent demand of some
listener-activists, but it was not a condition of the settlement
agreement.  In the early days of Pacifica, a printed program guide was
an essential membership benefit (and more important than any "premium"
or gift), as it was the only way that subscribers could plan their
listening.  With the adoption of strip programming, the abandonment of
the thematic programming model, the rollback of original documentary
production, and the posting of a reasonably accurate monthly
programming chart on the internet, a printed program guide is no
longer necessary.

If programming is radically changed so as to allow a printed guide to
provide subscribers with significant additional information of value
not easily accessible over the internet, and if advertising revenue
can be raised to substantially underwrite the cost of printing and
mailing, then printed Folios could possibly return.  Unless and until
then, a program grid included as an occasional single page promotional
insert into a local activist publication like Change Links is probably
all that we can reasonably hope and lobby for.

--Terry Goodman, KPFK Delegate

--  
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
http://wbai.net
Coalition for a democratic Pacifica

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wbaielections/
About elections throughout Pacifica: join the conversation

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

               

Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

New Pacifica Working Group
http://www.egroups.com/group/NewPacifica
'Save Our Stations!'


SPONSORED LINKS
Issues Pacifica Culture Participant Forging


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



-- 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

http://wbai.net
Coalition for a democratic Pacifica

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wbaielections/
About elections throughout Pacifica: join the conversation

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


New Pacifica Working Group
http://www.egroups.com/group/NewPacifica
'Save Our Stations!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Issues Pacifica Culture
Participant Forging


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.12