--- In NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Carolyn Birden <cmcb007@...> wrote: > > > My sincere apology: typed an N and just kept going - excuse it, please. No problem. I thought it was because you still aren't used to the novelty of having a dialog with me, considering I've never been a fan of the Save Pacifica bla bla bla movement. As you can see, Lorraine and "paco" et all were quite wrong about me. I'm not out to "destroy" Pacifica. I hope you've come to realize that too! > I still believe that any > restriction on directors' rights are dangerous, and a slippery slope: > seven hours or seven days will erode the principle just as surely as > seven weeks, I'm afraid. I believe it was George (from Houston) who posed the question, "if they don't give the notice, then what?" That wasn't really clarified, but the point was made by Dan earlier that there literally doesn't have to be any notice. Sadly, the way the resolution was written doesn't make it explicit. I sent in a version that did, but they didn't make use of the important word, "recommended." At least we got some of the other roadblocks lifted. btw, who can blame you guys for missing a meeting now and again? I think it's completely insane that you have to serve on so many boards and committees and meet on Friday nights. In my estimation, this whole structure is designed to keep a state of chaos. Take care, Nalini