Hi Wendy!
I'm glad you're going to get better but I'm sad that you're saying:
it is very obviously an epidemic, and we have yet to find out which
everyday thing is causing it.
I hope this doesn't mean you're buying the orthodox medicine line. If
getting cancer means joining the mainstream, the medical establishment
is one mainstream you don't want to join. I am surprised you don't seem
to have heard the other side of the story. I'm not deluding myself that
I can have any influence over you, but still I'm giving you a little of
the real story just to show that it's not all one-sided. And I assure
you that I'm *not* alone in this!
Cancer is a metabolic disease, and there's no simple cure or cause. It
is also an immune deficiency diesease. That's why nontoxic immune
enhancing treatment works so much better than orthodox radiation,
surgery and chemotherapy-- burn, cut and poison. But you won't hear
this because your doctors won't tell you about it and because they won't
allow it to be fairly or properly tested.
I also hope you're not falling for the "heroic" idea of medicine where
there are heroes and villains, and "magic bullets," like the War on
Cancer! Everyone needs to be treated differently-- even for so-called
infectious diseases-- and nontoxic physicians know this.
Do you really believe that some "everyday thing" is the cause, the key,
the magic bullet that will cure cancer? If that were so, with all the
money that's thrown away on cancer research, we would not be losing the
War on Cancer that was declared by President Nixon.
The tragedy is that so many of these nontoxic, progressive treatments
are far better than any the establishment can offer, but they fight
furiously to make sure that you'll never know that. If they didn't know
in their heart how harmful their treatments are, why would they fight so
hard to deny even the most innocuous treatments to the public?
A very helpful book is John M. Fink's *Third Opinion* 3rd Edition. I
hope you can get a copy and see some of the excellent medically
supervised programs that are available. Another good book is "Options"
by Richard Walter.
The nutritional Gerson Treatment is extreme in some ways, but it is
relatively inexpensive and some very resilient people have actually
cured themselves at home.
The Nicholas Gonzalez Treatment, also nutritional, is available in New
York or was last I heard, and is rated the most successful alternative
treatment in the world.
Pancreatic enzymes and hydrazine sulfate are both simple and inexpensive
treatments that profoundly help cancer patients in different ways. I'm
not suggesting that you treat yourself with either of these.
It's not true as your doctor may tell you that nontoxic treatments are
good as prevention and tonification but when you have tumors you need
"real" medicine. Once your body starts recognizing cancer cells you can
zap them in any numbers. Then you may need detoxification, another
thing that is used and developed in nontoxic medicine.
In fact, many people under the care of regular physicians die because
there are so many dead cells in their body. Regular doctors don't
recognize detoxification, so that many people die of the very poisonous
effect of dead tissue, or detritus, being inside the body.
There are good orthodox physicians and even some that care more about
you than about their orthodox, ineffective and very dangerous
treatments. But they are so few that it's almost not worth trying to
find them.
I'm not rattling on here to hear myself talk. I'm hoping at some point
(not now, because you're still in some stage of shock) you'll begin to
see there's more than one side to this story.
In solidarity,
Albert
hobces (at) yahoo.com
World Counselor for Hom?opathy
--- In NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wendy Schroell <wendy@...> wrote:
>
> I have already sent this note to the pnb and the kpft lsb, so if you
are
> on those lists, please forgive the duplicates. I feel very strongly
> that a personal experience might help others to take the warning
> seriously, so, here it is.
>
> wendy
>
> After almost a half century of being the most healthy person I know, I
> had a routine physical + mammogram in January. As many of you know, I
> have always been the one to take care of everyone else, not myself,
and
> the physical exams, blood tests, etc agreed with my layman's
assessment
> that I am Superwoman. Odd, but this year's mammogram part wanted a
bit
> more study to proclaim me as such. There is no family history of any
> kind of cancer on any side of my family - surely the more study would
be
> just an inconvenience.
>
> It was, and I will tell you all that the inconvenience has by now
> extended to a second mammogram, MRI, biopsy, CT of everything and
> ultrasound. It's been a very busy February. By now it is quite clear
> that the Superwoman with hardly any breasts at all has breast cancer.
>
> This was caught through a routine mammogram, and that is why I am
> bothering you all with it. PLEASE, if you're a woman, do breast exams
> monthly and mammograms once a year. No lumps does not mean everything
> is fine. I had not had any symptoms EVER, and while my own DCIS turns
> out to be quite extensive, it is not life threatening since we caught
it
> now. For awhile there it looked like it might be a lot more than
that.
>
> I'm done being upset and am now just furious - it is very obviously an
epidemic,
> and we have yet to find out which everyday thing is causing it. For
now,
> you women and you who love you women, please be proactive. You don't
have to be
> over 40 - I'm meeting all kinds of courageous women who have gone
through different
> degrees of breast cancer at every age. You know yourself best and can
> find things no one else can, but supplement with the technology that
we
> all love. If you don't have health insurance you can get mammograms
and
> people to read them for free. I can point you in this direction if
you
> need help, as I am now waaay into learning about things I never wanted
> to know. So interesting that it took me so long to break into
mainstream America.
>
> wendy
>