Re: [NewPacifica] Re: [fulcrumsofchange] Re: Bensky show - Pacifica Governance



 ....and the revolution is within the revolution.  /R

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <wanzala@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Michael Costello" <jmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
"Fulcrums of Change" <fulcrumsofchange@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 9:49 AM
Subject: [NewPacifica] Re: [fulcrumsofchange] Re: Bensky show - Pacifica 
Governance


I second michael's remarks. This is an excellent account of the dynamics at 
kpfa.

Joe w.

Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Costello <jmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:38:43
To:NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,       Fulcrums of Change 
<fulcrumsofchange@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [fulcrumsofchange] Re: Bensky show  - Pacifica Governance

Absolutely excellent description of the situation at KPFA Mara. Once in a 
while someone clearly sees and can put into words the reality of our 
struggle to truly democratize Pacifica. Each station in the network has its 
own unique problems. You've nailed KPFA's perfectly.

 Michael Costello
 Northbay for KPFA Folio
 (circa 2000)



 At 07:32 PM 3/30/2007 -0700, Mara wrote:
 It *was* a democratic takeover - mandated by the court -
 if you can call power reverting to the community a
 "takeover" - but it was subverted.

 At KPFA it was subverted by the "entrenched staff" -
 those who, in the long absence of committed
 management, had been running their own affairs for their
 own benefit - air time, maybe a salary, a professional career
 - & would not give up that power. They de facto had the
 power & would not share it. (To those who work in
 organizations this may be a familiar situation.)

 And this is where it stands today at KPFA. Half of the
 listener reps go along with the entrenched in resisting
 the ability of the LSB to have a hand in governance. They
 block the LSB from moving forward effectively. As others
 struggle to get something done, they characterize them
 as hostile, divisive, & having bad manners. They
 characterize the LSB as incompetent.

 To have a non-elitist station you need to have the
 programming not be in the hands of the staff. The
 listeners are needed to open the programming to the
 community & to have a variety of viewpoints.
 The staff have a conflict of interest in that they want
 to maintain their programs, & at KPFA this group, of
 which Bensky is a part, see their viewpoint as appropriate
 & the only reputable one for the station. The programming
 they want is a moderate progressive one - no "conspiracy
 theories": these are not reputable, & supposedly are not
 researched, 2-sourced, responsible, & professional.
 Programs like Flashpoints & Guns & Butter are disliked by
 this faction but continue because they are so popular
 with the listeners. They may be harassed, however, as
 Flashpoints has (& in fact it has moved its HQ out of the
 station, as Amy Goodman had to do).

 The entrenched faction will not allow this view of the
 situation to go out, however.
 The slate of listener reps that Larry & others promoted
 in the last KPFA election characterized its opposition
 as hostile & bad mannered, incompetent to fulfill their
 role in accomplishing things at LSB meetings, not wanting
 professional programming, wanting to take over all the
 programming with super radical programming,
 micromanaging instead of letting staff & GM manage,
 neglecting their real duties like fundraising & trying
 to meddle in programming by supporting a decision
 of the Program Council which the entrenched rejected.

 The listeners do not generally have a grasp of the
 issues at the station, since there is very little
 communication with them about this: no folio,
 LSB on air reports infrequent & not at a prime time,
 minutes & audios of LSB meetings months in arrears
 & possibly uninformative (n minutes), few meetings
 in outlying areas, meetings may be painful due to
 obstruction by entrenched faction.
 Elections, their cost & efficacy, are questioned by
 these people, & election information is scarce -
 few or no debates, few candidate meetings,
 mailings bought by those with the resources,
 etc.

 The listeners do know & love their programmers,
 & rely on them for their point of view about
 governance. And they are the ones with air time.

 Then there are the 2 General managers pushed
 out by those staff, when they would not do
 exactly as the staff wished.

 But this doesn't mean democracy will not work -
 those of us who are social/political activists don't
 give up on achieving justice; our approach to
 such problems is to use our power & creativity
 to solve the problems, not to give up.
 Where there is democracy there is a chance to
 struggle for truth & justice.
  -- Mara




New Pacifica Working Group
http://www.egroups.com/group/NewPacifica
'Save Our Stations!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewPacifica/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewPacifica/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:NewPacifica-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:NewPacifica-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    NewPacifica-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.16