A hearing is what she wanted. She was in fact sitting in the hearing. She should have remained quiet. And when she did speak, it had not merit. It didn't add anything to the dialog. She shouted "Thank you!" to one person's testimoney. And when Waxman asked her by name to respect the procedings, so she shouted, "Thank you" again. So in all, she deliberately got herself thrown out. If she had said anyting of any value to removing the current adminstration from office then it wasn't broadcast. To me it looked like a bid for attention. Plus, I was directly quoting from her retirement letter she sent out last year. As to "nobility," unfortunately Wall Street has such an impact on our manufactured concent that I now question all sides. It's quite refreshing in fact. Kevin White ----- Original Message ---- From: stephan <sgeras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:18:24 PM Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: [pacifica_now] Cindy Sheehan just removed from hearing media whore? and you're a listserve eunuch? what kind of nonsense are you spouting? a person needs to speak out and when a person is in a democratic process; a person doesn't need to respect (frivolous) "civilized" proceedural protocol where that protocol extends the abuse of power--that' s the "rub"; "whether 'tis nobler to accept...", or perhaps "nobility" has nothing to do with the decision since "protocol" is a means of suppressing dissent ----the chicago 7, or mumia didn't need to "dress appropriately" for fair trials, nor does cindy need to "address appropriately" . youuse got too much civilization. ..soon come the "babarian hordes". steppe ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin White To: pacifica_now@ yahoogroups. com ; NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com ; fulcrumsofchange@ pacificana. org Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:36 PM Subject: [NewPacifica] Re: [pacifica_now] Cindy Sheehan just removed from hearing Maybe she is a media whore after all... ----- Original Message ---- From: Melinda Iley-Dohn <Iley_dohn@yahoo. com> To: pacifica_now@ yahoogroups. com; NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com; fulcrumsofchange@ pacificana. org Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:30:59 PM Subject: Re: [pacifica_now] Cindy Sheehan just removed from hearing I FIRMLY believe in speaking out. I carried a sign a week ago to a hearing that John Conyers attended regarding the heinous Houston Crimminal system but I didn't yell out. I held up my sign that read "Convict Karl Rove for Contempt". I didn't yell because I would have interrupted people who included victims of this bad system. I would not condone kicking her out for holding a sign or wearing a tshirt that stated her opinion but when we have an already contentious bunch of GOP whiners, it's asking for it when a person screams out after being duly warned. I support Cindy and have seen her several times including when she was at Crawford but I do not support this. She was warned and knew the consequences if Mr. Conyers followed up his stated request for no interruptions. Peace and Love to you and yours....... Melinda Iley-Dohn Read a Blog- A gulity pleasure and You can learn!Leave your opinion so they can know you were there too! http://johnmccainis bushlite. blogspot. com/ - http://slaverynever existed.com/ http://texaslovesob ama.blogspot. com/ - http://muckraker- gg.blogspot. com/ Kevin White <cuitlacoche1@ yahoo.com> wrote: The first and only removal so far, other than perhaps our liberty...