[NewPacifica] Challenging the seven objectionable words



NYTimes.com Article
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 

Songwriter Sues F.C.C. Over Radio Sanctions
By NEIL STRAUSS

In an unusual counteroffensive, a New York poet and performance artist 
filed suit yesterday against the Federal Communications Commission, 
charging that it violated her First Amendment rights when it fined a 
radio station for playing a spoken-word song by her with vivid sexual 
imagery. 

The artist, Sarah Jones, asked for a judgment in federal district 
court in Manhattan that the 1999 song, "Your Revolution," is not 
indecent as the agency found; for an injunction preventing the 
commission from enforcing the $7,000 fine against KBOO-FM, a 
listener-supported station in Portland, Ore.; and for a finding that 
the commission's ruling violated her free-speech rights. 

Lawyers who specialize in First Amendment cases said it was extremely 
rare for an artist to intervene legally in a case of this sort, which 
usually pits the F.C.C. against the station it has sanctioned. The 
suit also represents a further development in a debate about whether 
the commission is too strict or too lax in policing the airwaves. 

John Winston, the assistant bureau chief for enforcement at the 
F.C.C., declined to comment on the Jones case. 

The dispute began in October 1999 when a listener was offended by the 
song during a music show called "Soundbox" and complained to the 
commission. In May, the F.C.C. fined the station for broadcasting 
"unmistakable patently offensive sexual references" that "appear 
designed to pander and shock." 

The commission prohibits certain things from being broadcast when 
children might be listening: any of seven objectionable words or 
material that it deems patently offensive as measured by contemporary 
community standards, especially references to "sexual or excretory 
activities and organs." 

Ms. Jones said she was surprised that her song was declared offensive 
because she wrote it as an attack on the degradation of women in 
mainstream hip-hop. "My name was hanging in the air with `indecent' 
attached to it in this really problematic way, especially since my 
work is concerned with social justice and feminist issues," she said 
yesterday. "That it should be associated with sexual indecency and 
intending to shock is not something that I can just let sit there, 
partly in light of the fact that other material is played ad infinitum 
on mainstream radio airwaves that's really problematic. I'm not one 
for censorship, but let's not use a double standard that victimizes 
certain voices." 

While the song does not contain any of the seven objectionable words 
flagged by the F.C.C., it does make explicit sexual references, which 
paraphrase lyrics from rap songs to denounce them as misogynist and 
shallow. 

In July KBOO contested the fine, but no action has been taken, said 
Lisa E. Davis, a partner at Frankfurt Garbus Kurnit Klein & Selz, the 
law firm representing Ms. Jones. 

The People for the American Way Foundation, a liberal organization, is 
working on Ms. Jones's case. "I think it's very clear that the song is 
not indecent, even under the F.C.C. criteria," said Elliot Mincberg, a 
vice president and legal director at the foundation. 

In recent years the F.C.C. has been buffeted by criticism from within 
and without, from the left and the right. Some critics charge that it 
is cracking down too hard on radio, others that it is too lenient. 
Some say the commission's rules on documenting violations are too 
strict; others say that its enforcement rules are inconsistent. And 
still others say its decision- making process on complaints and 
appeals is too slow. 

During the last year, in particular, the commission has been in the 
spotlight. Complaints against two morning show hosts for sexually 
explicit banter - one on WKQX-FM in Chicago, the other on WDGC-FM in 
Durham, N.C. - were dismissed last year because of a lack of 
documentation. Earlier this month the commission reversed its decision 
to fine KKMG-FM in Colorado Springs, for playing the Eminem single 
"The Real Slim Shady" in a version that already had words edited out 
for radio broadcast. 


http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/30/arts/30STAT.html?ex=1013418920&ei=1&;
en=3a9e2e9499e11a46

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ACHqaB/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/xYTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

New Pacifica Working Group
http://www.egroups.com/group/NewPacifica
'Save Our Stations!'

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
NewPacifica-unsubscribe@egroups.com
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.7