[NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins Again



--- In NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kevin White <cuitlacoche1@...> 
wrote:
>
> And I haven't heard from any Greens that Nader will be their 
candidate. The Unitarian who sleeps on the mattress on my floor told 
me that the Greens so far are not running a presidential candidate.
_________________________________________

Kev,

Untiarians on the floor? Don't you ever sweep up?
_________________________________________
> 
> Is this not still true?
> 
> Nader may be a coalition of... one. He could be a danger to 
McKinney's campaign.
> 
> Both votes.
> 
> K
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Melinda Iley-Dohn <Iley_dohn@...>
> To: NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:31:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins 
Again
> 
> How can you be so sure that the same old tired candidate won't make 
the Green Party look
> foolish by association? He has run several times before and his 
reuturns get slimmer each time. If the Democrats had run John 
Kerry,,Ted Kennedy or anybody else who had lost in past elections 
everybody would be asking why they would think that the next election 
would provide a different outcome. The Green Party thinks that by 
doing this that this proves that they are innovative.
>  
> If Nader wants to make himself useful he could be working to appear 
on these shows as political commentator. If he is so influental 
SURELY he can get a spot opposite WIlliam Kristol or Tom DeLay so 
that he could be the voice of reason. He COULD be doing like 
> Howard Dean by drawing fire on McCain to show what a hypocrite that 
he is driving around
> in the "Straight Talk Express" with a staff of lobbyists. He 
actually had LOBBYISTS on
> the Sunday shows argueing that he isn't influenced by Lobbyists! 
None of the talk show
> idiots pointed that out of course. 
>  
> Melinda
> 
> wanzala@gmail. com wrote:
> About what?
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melinda Iley-Dohn 
> 
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:16:37 
> To:NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins 
Again
> 
> 
> How can you be so sure?
> 
> wanzala@gmail. com wrote: He was asking me if I was referring to 
what he has seen - well knowing that I have not seen what he has 
seen, and also implying that the green party of houston is 
representative of the green party - and that his impression of them 
is accurate - which I highly doubt.
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melinda Iley-Dohn 
> 
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:04:15 
> To:NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins 
Again
> 
> 
> But the point is that he was stating what he has seen. It's the old 
thing my husband says to me all the time......Have you ever seen a 
bunch of New Jersey Italians ....(fill in the blank)? 
>   
> After fourteen years, he KNOWS what my experience is with them. I 
have never been 
> to Jersey without him. He's just using a figure of speech. No 
sarcism involved. Kevin may also know about your lack of knowlege of 
us too. I don't know but it doesn't look sarcastic. 
> He is calling them as he sees them. That IS allowed. 
>   
> 
> 
> wanzala@gmail. com wrote: He is being obtuse and/or facetious 
because he is asking me if I am referring to his impression of the 
green party in houston when in fact I have never been to texas let 
alone houston.
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melinda Iley-Dohn 
> 
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:11:07 
> To:NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins 
Again
> 
> 
> It's one thing to disagree and another to accuse Kevin 
> of being obtuse when he is just stating what he has 
> seen. He has the right to express himself too.
> 
> wanzala@gmail. com wrote: Kevin you can be painfully obtuse at 
times.
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin White 
> 
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:12:03 
> To:NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins 
Again
> 
> 
> In Houston the Green Party is a bunch of white male hippies with 
ponytails and long white beards. The only women there are a coupled 
of their wives, the host's wife who makes the vegitarian food, but 
most come single however. They wear sweaters because it cold. 
>   
> They are not very politically relavant. 
>   
> Is this what you're talking about?
> 
> K
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "wanzala@gmail. com" 
> To: NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 11:21:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins 
Again
> 
> Where is the green party not fighting like hell for things they can 
win? And why should the green party's aspirations be constrained by 
the limits of your imagination? If the green party in germany can 
become a serious force in that country's government, why not in the 
united states? Even two years ago, let alone 100 years ago, no one 
would have thought that a black person could be a presidential front 
runner. As recently as 20 years ago, blacks were also being 
admonished to stick to battles they can win and not aspire to higher 
things.
> 
> Did the green party get too uppity for you?
> 
> Your question 'what if obama wins what leg would this campaign 
stand on etc?' Makes no sense. Care to rephrase it?
> 
> And so what if obama is telegenic? Is that supposed to be some kind 
of meaningful attribute? 
> 
> You are making cynthia mckinney's color an issue. She was 
considering a run long before obama declared his own bid. The idea of 
a mckinney/nader ticket developed completely independent of obama.
> 
> You are no better than the right wingers racist cops in dc who 
discriminated against mckinney for saying 'she smacked a cop'. That 
is not what happened.
> 
> Her position on 9-11 is supported by evidence - unlike bush's 
conspiracy theory that you evidently buy into - and it is inspired by 
the same fierce independence, integrity and sense of justice that has 
made her one of the first to oppose the 1991 gulf war as a member of 
the georgia house of representatives.
> 
> the so-called progressive pols who 'find mckinney too toxic' have 
been busy spinelessly bending over to the neocons, 
with 'progressives' like those, who needs the neo-cons anyway.
> 
> Joe w.
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calvin Nicholson yahoo.com>
> 
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:39:13 
> To:NewPacifica@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [NewPacifica] Re: Nader: And Now the Slander Begins 
Again
> 
> 
> Once again, we a greeted to another Nader/Green
> Party/whatever run. Yawn. This is one of the reasons
> I left the Greens -- too busy wanting to grand stand
> in impossible races instead of fighting like hell for
> things they can win. 
> 
> The question becomes if Obama wins, what leg would
> this campaign stand on? Obscure votes only the most
> ardent political junkies would even know about? 
> 
> The GP make it a Nader/McKinney ticket so say "Hey we
> have negroes too!!", making them no more or no less
> cynical than the John McCain floating the idea of the
> shoe lady, Condi Rice, getting the VP slot. Also, as
> some already mentioned, shouldn't you be a party
> member before you demand a slot on the Presidential
> ticket? 
> 
> And after smacking a cop and signing on to the 9/11
> Truth movement, McKinney has officially written
> herself off as a crank and a loon, too toxic for even
> the most ardent progressive pols.
> 
> And against a telegenic candidate like Obama, they're
> both going to look flat footed.
> 
> The Naderites and Greens gone from flies in the
> ointment, to minor embarrassments (many Greens voted
> no contest and didn't want to ANYONE in '04) to a
> running gag, along with running a ham sandwich for
> city council.
> 
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile . 
yahoo.com/;_ ylt=Ahu06i62sR8H DtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ> yahoo.com/;_ 
ylt=Ahu06i62sR8H DtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
> 
>   
> 
> New Pacifica Working Group
> http://www.egroups. com/group/NewPacifi ca
> 'Save Our Stations!' 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------ ----
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. 
Try it now. 
> 
> New Pacifica Working Group
> http://www.egroups. com/group/ NewPacifica
> 'Save Our Stations!' 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------ ----
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? 
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
> 
> New Pacifica Working Group
> http://www.egroups. com/group/ NewPacifica
> 'Save Our Stations!' 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------ ----
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. 
> 
> New Pacifica Working Group
> http://www.egroups. com/group/ NewPacifica
> 'Save Our Stations!' 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------ ----
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. 
Try it now. 
> 
> New Pacifica Working Group
> http://www.egroups. com/group/ NewPacifica
> 'Save Our Stations!' 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
>       
______________________________________________________________________
______________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>




questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.16