[NewPacifica] Left Foot Forward, March!



Last post.

Very good summing up article. http://www.counterpunch.com/lucas12302005.html
/R

-

December 30, 2005

The Making of Mental Patients
Inside TeenScreen
By SANDRA LUCAS

In October, 2004, after taking TeenScreen, a 10-minute computer test
developed in the psychiatric department of Columbia University, 16-year-old
Chelsea Rhoades of Indiana was told she had two mental health problems,
obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and social anxiety disorder. The
diagnoses were based upon Chelsea's responses that she liked to help clean
the house and didn't "party" much.

Chelsea is one of countless children who get labeled with fraudulent
diagnoses every day. The difference in her case is that her parents, who
were unaware that TeenScreen had infiltrated their daughter's school and had
not given permission for the screening, reacted quickly. They filed a
lawsuit against the officials of the high school who allowed the test to be
administered and the TeenScreen program. In doing so, the Rhoades took a
stand for all parents across the nation.

The unscientific nature of psychiatric labeling was admitted to by the
American Psychiatric Association's own president, Steven Sharfstein, when he
stated on June 27, 2005, during an interview on the Today Show, "We do not
have a clean cut lab test [for diagnosing mental illness or chemical
imbalance of the brain.]"

His admission was quickly followed by another similar statement from
psychiatrist Mark Graff, Chairman of the American Psychiatric Association
Committee of Public Affairs, "Chemical imbalance: it's a shorthand term
really, it's probably drug industry derived. We don't have tests because to
do it, you'd probably have to take a chunk of brain out of someone - not a
good idea." Graff did more than admit to there being no science behind the
chemical imbalance theory. He also pointed out the incestuous relationship
between the drug industries and psychiatry.

TeenScreen is definitely a child born of that union, nothing more than an
unscientific written mental health survey which professes to discover
"mental illnesses", but in fact trolls for lifelong psychiatric patients in
our schools.

TeenScreen has been cleverly sold to numerous schools across the country as
a suicide prevention program with no scientific evidence backing up the
claim. The 1996 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found no evidence that
screening for suicide risk reduces suicide attempts or mortality.

The individuals pushing TeenScreen make every effort to hide evidence that
mental health screening is of no use in combating teen suicide. In order to
gain wide acceptance in our nation's schools they paint youth suicide as an
epidemic and their program as the cure-all.

According to the latest Census Bureau information, gathered in 2000, the
U.S. population of 14-19 year olds was around 19,800,000 and suicide for
that year accounted for 0.0008% of the total teen population. Each teen
suicide is an unfathomable tragedy, yet the actual numbers prove that
suicide is not an epidemic. In fact, suicide among American youth fell 25
percent in the last decade.

TeenScreen's executives are well aware of the actual situation. Rob Caruano,
former TeenScreen director, was quoted in the South Bend Tribune on December
22, 2004, "Teen Suicides, while tragic, are so rare that [any] study would
have to be impossibly huge to show a meaningful difference in mortality
between screened and unscreened students. You'd have to be screening almost
the whole country to reach statistical significance."

TeenScreen is far from being the solution. In fact, some experts agree that
widespread screening will increase the number of teen suicides. Jane
Pearson, PhD. who chairs the National Institute of Mental Health Suicide
Research Consortium said, " ... a prevention program designed for
high-school aged youth found that participants were more likely to consider
suicide a solution to a problem after the program than prior to the
program..." She also stated, " ... suicide is a very rare occurrence
compared to other causes of deaths. ... when researchers have tried to
predict suicide using as many known risk factors as possible, they are still
unable to predict who will and who will not commit this act."

The TeenScreen test is a 14-item, self-completion questionnaire. It usually
takes 10 minutes to complete and is used to screen youths from ages 11 to 18
who read at a 6th grade level. It asks questions such as "have you often
felt very nervous when you've had to do things in front of people?", or,
"Are you the kind of person who is often very tense, and finds it very hard
to relax?", or, "Has there been a time when nothing was fun for you and you
just weren't interested in anything?"

One would be hard pressed to find a teenager who wouldn't at one time or
another answer yes to those sorts of questions. TeenScreen refuses to
release copies of the questionnaire, even to parents and elected officials
who have requested to see the test.

TeenScreen, in an effort to make the program appear innocuous, claims that
it does not recommend or endorse any particular kind of treatment for the
youth who are identified by the screening. But, in one of many conflicting
statements Laurie Flynn, TeenScreen's director, reveals that the long-term
goal of TeenScreen is not just identification, but treatment for those in
need, and that parents of youths found to be at possible risk a re notified
and helped in identifying and connecting to local mental health services.

Particularly distressing is the data released by a recent survey, printed in
JAM Academy Adolescent Psychiatry 2002, showing that nine out of ten
children who see a psychiatrist are given psychiatric drugs.

A recent survey showed that between 1995 and 1999, the use of
antidepressants increased 151% for 7 to 12 year olds and 580% for children
under six. Between 1998 and 2003, there was another 49% increase in children
taking antidepressants. Sales of the drugs have now reached more than $13
billion a year.

To make matters worse, on September 15, 2004, the FDA stated that a causal
role for antidepressants in inducing suicidality had been established in
pediatric patients, and that children given psychiatric dru gs were twice as
likely to commit suicide as those given a placebo. As a result of this
finding, the FDA ordered drug manufacturers to place a Black-Box warning on
all antidepressant labels. The Black-Box warning is the most serious measure
that the FDA can take regarding a prescription medication, short of an
outright ban. That initial Black-Box warning label requirement has since
been followed by 15 more official warnings on psychiatric drugs.

Eileen Dannemann of the National Coalition of Organized Women describes the
TeenScreen approach as a telling omission. "We've got eight million American
kids on psychiatric drugs," she said. "While TeenScreen asks the kids if
they are usin g street drugs, they omit to find out about the use of psych
drugs. Antidepressants play a major role in youth suicide. If [TeenScreen]
really wanted to help they would worry about that. The fact that they don't
shows their real intention."

It becomes obvious that teens will not benefit from TeenScreen. The question
that begs to be asked is "Who will benefit?"

Psychologist, author and director of Texans for Safe Education, John
Breeding, doesn't mince words, "TeenScreen is nothing more than a government
sponsored marketing tool created to serve the interests of the corporate
pharmaceutical industry and psychiatrists. It is a shame and a disgrace that
the United States is putting millions of children on psychiatric drugs
today. This is obviously not enough to satisfy the insatiable greed of big
pharma. We must stop TeenScreen and protect our children from more deadly
poisoning."

TeenScreen is the brainchild of psychiatrist David Shaffer of Columbia
University. Shaffer is a paid consultant for pharmaceutical companies
Hoffman la Roche, Wyeth, and GlaxoSmithKline. Shaffer is also the director
of the Division of Child Psychiatry at the New York State Psychiatric
Institute. A New York Post article dated January 31, 1999, State Testing
Prozac on 6-Year olds; Parents Not Told About Risks Including Suicide and
Mania, read, "The New York State Psychiatric Institute in Manhattan is
performing little-known but extensive Prozac experimentation on troubled
kids as young as 6 years old, according to internal records. While the
potentially deadly danger was cited in the researchers' documents, it was
not included in the consent forms given to children and their parents to
read and sign."

Laurie Flynn, the current director of TeenScreen is also the former director
of the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI). While Flynn was the
director of NAMI, a group that bills itself as "a grassroots organization of
individuals with brain disorders and their family members", NAMI received
$11.72 million from various drug companies between 1996 and mid-1999. One
drug company went as far as "loaning" one of its executives to NAMI, still
paying for his salary while he worked at NAMI's headquarters.

In view of Flynn's cozy relationships with drug companies, officials of the
program are working hard at minimizing any link to the drug companies by
saying that they are not funded by drug money. Yet, the Tennessee Department
of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities newsletter, Update -
May/June 2002, revealed that a recent local TeenScreen survey was partly
funded by pharmaceutical giant, Eli Lilly.

The goal of TeenScreen is one item they are not afraid to reveal: to provide
mental health screening for every single American teen. If TeenScreen' s
goal is achieved, all 19,800,000 youths will receive a "mental health
checkup". Considering that 71% of teens who were screened in Colorado were
labeled with a mental disorder, should TeenScreen succeed in its goal, it is
possible that 71% of our teens would end up being labeled. This means that
no less than 14,058,000 American youth would end up labeled mentally ill.
Since nine out of ten children who receive "treatment" are given
mind-altering psychiatric drugs, the inevitable conclusion is that
12,652,200 would be drugged.

The average price of a prescription for psychiatric drugs is $102 per month.
TeenScreen's endeavors would increase the pharmaceutical companies' monthly
revenues by $1,290,524,400.

To ensure success, TeenScreen officials prefer the Passive Consent form
which requires parents to return a form to the school only if they do not
want their child to participate in the screening. Flynn is quick to deny
promoting the use of Passive Consent to schools. However, Flynn's statement,
like many others, is far removed from the truth. Numerous high schools only
use Passive Consent forms and, as in the case of Flager Palm Coast High
School in Florida, the passive acceptance style was discussed by school
officials to increase the numbers of participants from 50% for Active
Consent to near 95% for Passive.

Incentives such as pizza or movie coupons are distributed to the kids
because, as TeenScreen co-director, Leslie McGuire, said during a national
conference, "Getting the kids to buy-in is such an essential thing because
for the most part, you're distributing the consent forms to the kids to
bring home to their parents and bring them back. So you have to get their
buy-in, you have to get them interested."

TeenScreen goes as far as to advise local schools on how to circumvent
federal law. The Protection of Pupil Rights Act (PPRA) protects the rights
of parents by making instructional materials available for their inspection
if the materials are to be used in connection with a survey, analysis, or
evaluation in which their child is participating. It also requires written
parental consent before minors are required to take part in such a survey,
analysis, or evaluation.

The TeenScreen News (Fall 2003, Vol. 2, Issue 2) instructs schools that
making the TeenScreen survey a part of the curriculum will help them get
around the PPRA, " ... if the screening will be given to all students, as
opposed to some, it becomes part of the curriculum and no longer requires
active parental consent."

But even if active consent forms were used for all children being tested by
TeenScreen, it still would provide no protection for unsuspecting parents.
Before parents can make a truly educated decision they must be told all the
facts. Then, and only then, can they provide informed consent.

A true informed consent form would tell parents the following:

  * Chemical imbalance of the brain is only a theory with no science of
proof to back it up

  * While screening is not a scientific and medical test it might still
result in the child being labeled depressed or mentally ill

  * Should the child be labeled, the likely recommended course of treatment
will be psychiatric drugs

  * Psychiatric drugs are known to cause children to commit sui cide

  * Should parents refuse the recommended course of treatment, a referral to
the local child welfare agency might be made, which could result in the
child being taken away from home and forcibly drugged

Flynn has made it clear that she will go to any length in getting acceptance
for TeenScreen. While testifying in front of a Senate Committee in
Washington, she claimed to be in partnership with the University of South
Florida in piloting district wide mental Health screenings of 9th graders in
Hillsborough and Pinellas counties, Florida.

Wilcox Clayton, Pinellas County School Board Superintendent, was quick to
set the record straight. He emphatically stated that no such screening was
taking place and added, "If this person [Laurie Flynn] said what they
allegedly said, I would have serious reservations about partnering with such
an organization."

TeenScreen is designed only to increase psychiatric and drug company
revenues by turning normal ch ildren into lifelong mental patients. Now is
the time for anyone who cares about children and the future to step up and
demand that mental health screening not be allowed in any schools at any
time.

Sandra Lucas is the Executive Director of the Utah Chapter of the Citizens
Commission on Human Rights, a mental health watchdog group. She was born in
Sydney, Australia, raised on the French South Pacific island of New
Caledonia. She moved to the United States at the age of 15 and has lived in
Salt Lake City with her family since 1992. She can be reached at
lucsan@xxxxxxxxx







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Help save the life of a child. Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/f4eSOB/lbOLAA/E2hLAA/xYTolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

New Pacifica Working Group
http://www.egroups.com/group/NewPacifica
'Save Our Stations!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewPacifica/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    NewPacifica-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.12