RE: [NewPacifica] {Fulcrumsofchange] Jimmy Carter Conspicuously Absent From Podium



  And not only Carter was absent. Regretful and as stupid as John Edwards'
infidelity was, if willing he and his family belonged up front at the
convention. Just what criteria must one pass in order to participate in the
national Democratic process?  Getting caught at what wealthy and powerful
males often do was hardly a good excuse for dismissal. 

 

..you know KPFA. Go along to get along..with the Democrats. Ever wonder why
they rarely dissect the SF political establishment.from a rad pov?  /R  

 

     

-----Original Message-----
From: NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:NewPacifica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Joseph Wanzala
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 1:08 PM
To: newpacifica; Fulcrums of Change; action greens
Subject: [NewPacifica] {Fulcrumsofchange] Jimmy Carter Conspicuously Absent
>From Podium

 

Was there any commentary/speculation re Carter's exclusion in the

Pacifica coverage - or any other coverage for that matter.

 

 

 

http://www.forward.com/articles/14110/

 

Jimmy Carter Conspicuously Absent From Podium

 

 

By Brett Lieberman and Nathan Guttman

Thu. Aug 28, 2008

 

 

Denver - Former president Jimmy Carter's controversial views on Israel

cost him a place on the podium at the Democratic Party convention in

late August, senior Democratic operatives acknowledged to the Forward.

 

Breaking with the tradition of giving speech time to living former

presidents, convention organizers honored Carter with only a short

video clip highlighting his work with Hurricane Katrina victims and a

brief walk across the Pepsi Center stage.

 

The sidelining of Carter was driven by recognition in the Obama camp

and among Democratic leaders that giving the former president a

prominent convention spot might alienate Jewish voters.

 

"What more could we do to diss Jimmy Carter?" said a Democratic

official who was involved in deliberations on how to handle the former

president's presence at the convention. The treatment Carter received,

the official added, "reflects the bare minimum that could be done for

a former president."

 

Although Carter says limiting his presence at the convention was his

idea, denying him a speaking opportunity ends a two-year struggle for

the party over how to deal with the controversial former president.

Since Carter published a book in November 2006 accusing Israel of

practicing apartheid against the Palestinians, Democrats have been

trying to distance themselves from the former president and to

convince Jewish activists that he does not represent the party line.

 

Carter's status at the convention was an issue for the Democratic

leadership going back to the early preparation stages, a party

official said. The solution to what one Democratic official referred

to as "the Carter problem," however, was not found until the final

run-up to the Denver convention.

 

Carter, according to party insiders, was initially scheduled to speak

at the event, though organizers insisted he focus only on issues

relating to domestic policy and not touch on foreign affairs. During

his speech at the 2004 Democratic convention in Boston, Carter

mentioned Israel, but he only touched in general terms on the need to

bring peace to the region.

 

As the Denver convention drew near, organizers grew uneasy with the

idea of having Carter speak even on domestic issues. In the end, the

decision was made to have what the official convention schedule

described as a "President Jimmy Carter segment," which included a

video presentation of the former president's work in New Orleans. The

video was followed by a brief appearance by Carter and former first

lady Rosalynn Carter, who walked across the stage to the sound of Ray

Charles's "Georgia on My Mind." The assembled delegates showered

Carter with applause and a standing ovation.

 

Jewish Democrats approved of Carter's limited presence at the

convention, as they have argued that embracing the former president

could tarnish the party in November.

 

"You can't give him a podium, because people will draw the conclusion"

that the Democratic Party supports Carter's views on the Middle East,

said Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York. "I wouldn't let him within 100

miles of the convention center, because it would be used by an

unscrupulous Republican Party that doesn't care about the truth in

character assassination against our candidate."

 

While Carter did come to Denver, he downplayed suggestions that he had

been silenced.

 

In an August 26 interview with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution,

Carter said that the idea not to speak at the convention was his own.

 

"Michelle spoke last night, Barack is going to speak Thursday night

and the other two nights are for the Clintons," Carter said. "So, I

didn't want to intrude.. I didn't need to get on the stage and make a

speech."

 

Delegates from Carter's home state of Georgia did not seem to take

much offense at the former president not being among the conventions'

speakers.

 

"I didn't think much of it at all," delegate Freddie Mitchell said.

"He has spoken at a number of these things in the past."

 

Among some of Jewish delegates to the convention, however, denying

Carter a speech but offering him a video tribute was not nearly

sanction enough.

 

"He hasn't shown respect to Israel and many of the Jewish

constituencies here based on the things he has done," said Nan Rich, a

Florida state senator who left the hall in protest before Carter's

appearance onstage.

 

Although staunch critics of Carter may not have been won over by the

Obama campaign's sidelining of the former president, at least one one

Jewish Democratic official says the episode reflects the degree to

which the presidential hopeful is concerned about shoring up Jewish

support before November.

 

"I think it's hard to ask a political party to take a former president

and say, 'We're not going to hear you at all,'" said Ira Forman,

executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council. "The

party is very sensitive to the American Jewish community, and it's

very sensitive to ever conveying that this is anything but a

pro-Israel party."

 

And though Rich chose to protest Carter's inclusion, she was among the

critics who appreciated the decision to minimize his role.

 

"It shows the party gets it and Barack Obama's campaign gets it," she said.

 

------------------------------------

 

JPEG image



questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.16