Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )

Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:37:50 -1000
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
To: Mark Smith <nanog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )

> The model isn't very new at all.

no it isn't.  many of us remember atm-1, so atm-2 is no big surprise.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )
  - From: Mark Smith

References:
- NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )
  - From: Durand, Alain
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )
  - From: Mark Smith
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )
  - From: Randy Bush
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )
  - From: Mark Smith
- Re: NAT v6->v4 and v4->v6 (was Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 )
  - From: Mark Smith