Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)



On Tue, Oct 02, 2007, John Curran wrote:

> We're likely going to have to agree to disagree on the impacts
> of a "market", as you see an "additional O(1M) routes" being
> the total impact (over the remaining lifetime of IPv4!), whereas
> I see no such limit on additional routes with balkanization as
> the inevitable result.

Has anyone modelled the behaviour of current equipment in a world with 1
million ipv6 table entries? Heck, what about a world with 500,000 ipv6
entries and a BGP announcement churn rate along GIH's prediction curve?



Adrian



questions/problems with archive to: webmaster@mcabee.org
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.16